The first line of defense against suicide terrorism should be to prevent people from becoming terrorists, rather than to protect targets from being attacked, according to a U-M researcher whose analysis appears in the March 7 issue of Science.

“Suicide terrorists are not crazed cowards who thrive in poverty and ignorance. In fact, most ‘human bombs’ have no appreciable psychopathology and are at least as educated and economically well-off as surrounding populations,” says Scott Atran, an anthropologist and psychologist at the Institute for Social Research (ISR).

“They don’t act from rational self-interest, opting for paradise out of despair because they feel there is nothing much to lose in this world,” says Atran, who also is affiliated with the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris. “Nor are they sacrificing themselves for what they see as the good of their group, even though they are fiercely loyal to their ‘families’cells of fellow terrorists who take on the role of fictive kin. Instead, they are being deliberately manipulated by religious and political elites, who are pulling strings attached to deeply rooted, culturally universal human propensities to see the world in religious terms. Even secular groups that sponsor suicide terrorism draw deeply on these propensities.

“In much the same way,” he says, “fast food companies and purveyors of pornography capitalize on innate human inclinations toward sweet, fatty foods and sex, tricking people into doing things that have no personal advantage.”

In the Science article and in his recent book, “In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion” (Oxford University Press, 2002), Atran maintains that religiondefined as a community’s costly and hard-to-fake commitment to a counterfactual and counterintuitive world of supernatural agentsis not an evolutionary adaptation at all, as many neo-Darwinists argue, but an evolutionary by-product of early man’s ancient emotional and cognitive terrain.

“From an evolutionary point of view, the reasons religion should not exist are patent,” Atran says. “It is materially, emotionally and cognitively costly. As Bill Gates says, ‘There’s a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning.’ Yet it is universal across human history and cultures. The question is why, and what accounts for the properties and practices common to all religions?”

One of these common practices, he notes, is a sacrificial display of costly commitment to supernatural agents that appears irrational but actually helps people deal with inescapable catastrophes in life for which there otherwise are no factual or logical solutions possible. Martyrdom (including suicide terrorism) is an extreme form of religious practice, the ultimate way to display devotion. “Evolution has made our emotions extremely powerful,” Atran says. “With music, chanting and swaying in prayer, and other forms of communion, religion evokes and coordinates that power, enabling people to collectively face vulnerability, deception, loneliness, injustice and even death.”

Despite the deep roots of suicide terrorism in religious sentiments, which are deliberately parasitized and manipulated by political and religious elites, the first line of defense must be to reduce the receptivity of potential recruits who are mostly ordinary people, Atran says. The most effective ways to do this are not to try to educate or elevate the economic conditions of the populations from which suicide terrorists often spring, or to bombard them with self-serving information, he says. Instead, the United States and its allies should try to empower moderates from within the community and strengthen interactions between members of different religious and political groups, he says.

“Another strategy is to change our own behavior by addressing grievances and reducing feelings of humiliation, especially in Palestine, where media images of daily violence have made it the global focus of Moslem attention,” Atran says.

Atran considers our current homeland security strategy of protecting targets as a last line of defense, since it probably is the most expensive to implement and the easiest to breach, because of the abundance of vulnerable targets and would-be attackers.

“In the long run, our society can ill afford to ignore either the consequences of its own actions or the causes behind the actions of others,” he says. “The cost of such ignorance is terrible to contemplate.”